Showing posts with label 2 Peter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2 Peter. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

We know what a day is!

One tactic employed by old earth compromisers who try to reconcile their bankrupt theories with the clear words of Scripture is to haggle over the meaning of the word, “day.”  It’s weird, too, because the meaning of that simple word is not debated anywhere it appears in Scripture except for Genesis 1.  When Joshua marched around Jericho for 7 days, how long did he march around Jericho?  When Jonah was in the belly of the whale for 3 days, how long was he in the belly of the whale?  These sound like trick questions because the answers seem so obvious.  Yet when you ask a theistic evolutionist or old earth creationist how long it took God to create the heavens and the earth, suddenly they don’t know what a day is.  Excuse me while I roll my eyes.

Now, I’m the first to admit that words can have a range of meanings.  Even the word “day” can have multiple meanings.  If I were to say, “I have trouble seeing at night so I only drive during the day,” would you know what I mean?  Of course you would.


What if I were to say something like, “Back in my day, kids walked to school”?  Yes, I don’t think you’d have any trouble understanding that either.


If someone said I might win a Nobel Prize for my blog, I would probably answer, “That’ll be the day.”  In this case, “day” means a time that’s never going to happen - yet even then, no one struggles to understand the word.  


When God commanded His people to work six days and rest on the seventh (Exodus 20:11), do you think any of them stopped to ask, “I wonder what God means by six days?”  Hardly!  It seems like the word is easily understood everywhere it is used - in or out of the Bible - except in Genesis 1.  How strange!


So if the word “day” can mean so many different things, how can we know what it means in Genesis 1?  If only there were a definition given in the text //RKBentley stares off in the distance in deep thought//.  Oh wait - there is!!  


Genesis 1:1-5, In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.


Oh, I see it now.  When God made the world, it was dark.  Then He made the light.  He called the light day, and the dark and light periods together (evening and morning) were also a day.  Duh!


“Day” can mean many things, but it can also mean a single rotation of the earth - the day/light cycle - of about 24 hours.  In fact, it usually means a 24-hour period.  So when the Bible provides a definition right in the text, why do people grope around for some other meaning?  


A while back, I wrote a series (here) rebutting a video by Inspiring Philosophy who claimed 10 scriptural problems with young earth creationism.  In the introduction to the video, the narrator said the following:


If you haven't heard, there are millions of people today who believe the earth is only about 6,000 years old and, about 4,000 years ago, there was a worldwide flood that destroyed all life on land except for a few people and two of every animal that survived in an ark. The basis of this theory comes from many who say that we ought to take a literal or a plain reading of the Bible, the Holy Book of Christianity.


The rational behind this young earth view, is that they are just taking the plain reading of the text and that Christians, who believe the earth is old, have to misconstrue or reinterpret passages to make the Bible fit with an ancient earth and the theory of evolution. 


Um… yes.  In order to make the Bible fit with an old earth and the theory of evolution, evolutionists have to make the clear words of the Bible mean something other than what the words ordinarily mean.  That’s exactly what Inspiring Philosophy does.  It’s what every evolutionist who claims to believe the Bible does.  The word day, to them, can’t mean “evening and morning” so they muddy the waters with a bunch of gobbledygook about how day could mean a bunch of other things too.  Meanwhile, they ignore the most ordinary meaning.


2 Peter 1:20 says, “no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.”  Yet in the case of Genesis 1, the word day means an undefined period of time that includes millions or even billions of years.  Exactly how does that fit the definition of “evening and morning” given in the text?  It’s the epitome of a private interpretation.  I can only think of 2 reasons they do this: they either are intentionally twisting the meaning of the word day in order to make the Bible fit their godless theory (which they deny) or they can't read.  


I think we all know which it is.

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Earth Day?

Today is Earth Day.  Oh brother!  According to Wikipedia, Earth Day is an annual event on April 22 to demonstrate support for environmental protection.”  That sounds all well and good but I’ve noticed that since its inception in 1970, it’s morphed into a cult-like worship of “Mother nature” and leftist causes. Some sites brag that it’s recognized in 192 countries and that it’s the largest secular holiday in the world.  Hmm, I’d have to think about that one.  Most of the world lives in crushing poverty so I’m not sure how many people outside of developed countries even know the event is happening.  Inside the US, I'm sure it ranks well behind Halloween, Independence Day, and probably even Cinco de Mayo in celebrated secular holidays. 

In the infancy of Earth Day, back in the 70s, the focus was on “overpopulation.” It was feared that the earth did not have enough resources to support the three billion or so people who lived in the world back then so an early objective of Earth Day was to push for zero population growth. The idea of having children was booed by environmental advocates. Paul Erlich, author of The Population Bomb and an early champion of Earth Day made these radical statements:


[T]he first task is population control at home. How do we go about it? Many of my colleagues feel that some sort of compulsory birth regulation would be necessary to achieve such control. One plan often mentioned involves the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size.” [The Population Bomb, pp. 130-131]


Of course, abortion was also one of the big issues of the 70s and liberals used population control as another reason to support their argument to allow abortion. Thus, the left has also used Earth Day to defend their pro-abortion position. Liberals often defend their radical agendas by saying, “it's for the children.” In the case of abortion, that doesn't quite have the same effect so they instead said, “it's for the planet.”


And I can't resist mentioning the evolutionary connection to Earth Day. A few years back, I posted this Oakland Zoo quote about their Earth Day celebration:


Bring the whole family out to the Oakland Zoo… for Earth Day 2009 Festivities! This year, the theme is "We're All Connected." All of the world is connected in a beautiful web of life, including you!


Today, Earth Day is all about climate change and the environment.  Consider this excerpt from a USA Today article about today’s event:


For the 55th year, the world is using the day to celebrate Mother Nature and the wonderful planet we live on.


"Earth Day really is a symbol of the environmental movement," Sarah Davies, the director of communications and media at EarthDay.org, told USA TODAY. "You know, it started back in 1970 under President Nixon, which is always kind of amazing to think about."


Earth Day has always been a day that acknowledges our planet, which provides for us, and ways we can protect and preserve its beauty.

 

Seriously?  We’re supposed to “celebrate Mother Nature”?  Our planet provides for us?  Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for appreciating the Earth’s environment. But there’s a fine line between appreciation and adoration and I fear too many people blur the distinction.


Let me remind Christians about our role in the world and God’s plan for us. And let me be clear about Who we're celebrating!


First, we are made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26). We’re different from the animals. When God made Adam, he wasn’t like the beasts or the birds; he was in the image of God. When God made Eve, Adam at last saw someone like himself. Upon seeing Eve he exclaimed, “This is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh” (Genesis 2:23). But some celebrants of earth day don’t draw the line between humans and animals


Another commandment God gave to Adam and Eve is to be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth” (Genesis 1:28). He gave this same command to Noah and his family after they left the Ark (Genesis 9:1). Procreation is a blessed event that God encourages within marriage.  


Still another thing that bothers me about Earth Day is the misguided notion that it’s somehow noble to leave the environment untouched. Don’t get me wrong, I believe we should be good stewards over the environment; but don’t forget that God said, “Let them [men and women] have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth” (Genesis 1:26).  God is our Provider, not “mother nature.”  And He gave us the earth to be of service to us - not the other way around!


Finally, I’m a little uneasy with the whole “nature worship” that seems to go on this day. Romans 1:25 talks about how people, “worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator.” I remind you of the dreadful day of the Lord discussed in 2 Peter 3:10:


But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.


This earth and everything in it is going to pass away. While we’re here, don’t pollute, act responsibly, and let’s be good stewards over what God has given us. Beyond that, don’t get too caught up with this “Earth Day” craze. I believe it focuses on all the wrong things.


Be thou exalted, O God, above the heavens: and thy glory above all the earth; (Psalm 108:5)

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

The Passion Week: Tuesday

This Easter season, I’ve made a series of posts addressing skeptics’ criticism surrounding the Resurrection.  As we close in on Easter, I want to do a day-by-day detail discussing the events happening during the Passion Week.  

Please keep checking back!




Tuesday


On the way back to Jerusalem, the group again passes by the fig tree that Jesus had cursed the day before.  The tree that was green and healthy just the day before was now brown and withered.  It is a haunting foreshadow of Jesus’ impending confrontation with the Jewish leaders.


When Jesus entered the Temple, He resumed preaching and teaching as was His daily practice.  He was confronted by the chief priests and elders who asked, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority? Jesus responded by asking them where John the Baptist had received his authority.  The leaders then faced a dilemma: they didn’t want to acknowledge John’s authority as being from God but neither did they want to raise ire among the crowd who believed in John, so they refused to answer.  Therefore, Jesus didn’t answer their question.


Matthew 21 tells us that Jesus next gave two parables.  The first was of two sons who were told by their father to go work in his vineyard.  The first said no, but later repented and went to work.  The second said yes, but ultimately never went to work.  The point of the parable is that it’s our actions - not our words - that demonstrate our obedience.  The Pharisees claimed they followed the Law of Moses, but in practice they never did.


Then Jesus spoke the Parable of the Tenants, where the owner of a vineyard let out his vineyard before going away on a long trip.  When the harvest came, the owner sent servants and eventually his own son to collect his profits from the tenants.  The wicked tenants mistreated the servants and even killed the son, hoping to keep the profits and even inherit the vineyard.  Then Jesus reveals the point of the parable:


Matthew 21:40-45, When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen? They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons. Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder. And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them. 


It was the lesson of the fig tree come to life!  The religious leaders were the disobedient sons who told their father they would work in the field but didn’t.  They were wicked tenants who worked in the owner’s vineyard, but would not give the owner the bounty of it.  Just like the fig tree, they presented themselves as healthy and productive but they bore no fruit, so the Kingdom of God would be taken from them and given to the Church!


The back and forth between Jesus and the religious leaders continued with Jesus ultimately condemning them with “Seven Woes” (Matthew 23):  


V. 13, But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.  


V. 15, Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.


V. 16, Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!


V. 23, Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith:


V. 25, Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.


V. 27, Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness.


V. 29-31, Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. 


After His blistering condemnation, Jesus laments over Jerusalem, Matthew 23:37-39, “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.”  After this, Jesus leaves the Temple. 


As He is walking down from the Temple Mount with His disciples, I can imagine there may have been an awkward silence that hung over the group.  It could be that they had never seen Jesus this angry and weren’t sure what they should say or do.  Perhaps to break the silence or lighten the mood, the disciples remarked on the beautiful buildings of the temple.  Jesus, however, stunned them back into silence with a frightful prophecy:


Matthew 24:2, And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.


Later, as Jesus sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples had mustered the courage to ask Him about His comments.  They asked Him 2 questions (Matthew 24:3):


  1. Tell us, when shall these things be?

  2. And what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?


Jesus’ response to these questions has become known as the Olivet Discourse.  Notice, there are two questions.  Many Bible commentaries treat them as though they are one question (essentially, ‘when and how will the world end?’).  This has led to some confusion because some of the things Jesus tells them will happen during the lives of the disciples and other things will happen at the end of the age.  


An adequate discussion of the Olivet Discourse would be too long for this post.  I do, however, want to direct your attention to v. 14, And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.  Wow!  God has withheld His judgment even until now, giving the entire world the opportunity to hear the gospel!  The Bible says that God is not willing that any should perish but that all might come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9).  He is not some tyrant king, looking for any chance to punish his subjects!  He is the loving father of Luke 15, who sees his wayward son returning from a life of rebellion, and runs to him, and showers him with love and blessings!  Amen!!


Which brings us back to the lesson of the fig tree.  Jesus concludes His discourse with these words (v.32-33): Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh: So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.


The parable of the wicked tenants wasn’t only to the scribes and Pharisees but also to the Church.  We are the tenants of the vineyard, now, and it is our job to produce the fruit that is due to Him.  Let us not be like that deceitful tree that appeared productive because of its green leaves but still did not produce fruit.  His return is near - let us go now and preach the gospel to every creature!!

Saturday, October 8, 2022

10 Scriptural problems with theistic evolution

I believe the Bible so obviously tells us that Genesis is intended to be literal history that evolution believing Christians have to ignore or reinterpret whole passages of Scripture in order to make it fit with their secular understanding of our origins. A while back, I wrote a series rebutting a video titled, “10 Biblical Problems for Young Earth Creationism,” by a group called Inspiring Philosophy.  It was actually one of many examples of similar claims, where old-earth, theistic evolutionists try to convince us that the Bible really doesn’t endorse a recent, miraculous, sudden creation. 

To me, the fact that so many such claims exist are evidence that the Bible seems to plainly confirm a six day creation.  It is only for that reason that evolutionists have to go to great lengths to explain why the Bible doesn’t really mean what it so clearly seems to say.  Rather than waste my time rebutting any more of their questionable hermeneutics, I thought it would be fun to point out ten passages from the Bible that are extremely problematic to compromising Christians.





Let’s get to it.  Here they are in no particular order:


#1: 2 Peter 1:20,Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.


We see here, immediately, that the Bible was written to mean what it says.  There’s no hidden meaning.  There’s no secret code that can only be uncovered with scientific inquiry.  The most obvious meaning of any passage is likely the intended meaning and there’s no need to look for a deeper meaning - especially a completely contrary meaning - every time a passage doesn’t comport with our personal beliefs.  


When Jesus was criticized by the Pharisees, who would accuse Him with some minute point of the Law, Jesus often responded by saying, “Haven’t you read….” followed by a passage relevant to the subject at hand.  In every instance, He relied on an ordinary understanding of the passage to prove His point.  He never had to say, “What that really means is….”  


Keep this first point in mind as you read through the rest of the verses on this list.  You may have heard responses to some of these points before but maybe you will see how many sound like “private interpretations” of Scripture.


#2: Exodus 20:9-11, Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. 


In the midst of the Ten Commandments, when the LORD gave the Law to Moses, He commanded that His people should observe the Sabbath.  They should work for six days and rest on the seventh in the same way He worked for six days and rested on the seventh when He created the universe.  Do you think the Jews had to stop and ask themselves, “How long does God mean by a ‘day’?”  


To say this passage somehow means billions of years is the epitome of a private interpretation.  A billions of years old universe is a relatively new idea, one that has only existed a couple of centuries.  The modern methods evolutionists have used to guess at the age of the earth are methods that weren’t available to the ancients.  Theistic evolutionists must believe in an interpretation of this passage that the first readers could not possibly have known.  


#3: Genesis 1:29-30, “And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.  And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.


To believe in evolution, a Christian must believe that death, disease, and suffering existed millions of years before Adam appeared.  They mock creationists for believing the sharp teeth of T-rex would have originally been used to eat plants and not other animals.  Of course, creationists believe this because that’s exactly what this passage says.  God gave every single beast of the earth plants to be its food “and it was so!”  It is not creationists who should be embarrassed for believing this; it is the compromising Christians who should be ashamed for denying the clear words of the text!


#4: Genesis 7:21-23, And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died. And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.


Some evolutionists claim the Flood is a completely fictitious event.  Theistic evolutionists, on the other hand, aren’t so quick to completely accept that such a vividly described account is mere storytelling.  Instead, they assert that the Flood was a local phenomenon, limited to the Mesopotamian Valley.  It was only “universal” in the sense that it killed all humans - because all humans lived in just that area.  


I agree that if there were 1,000,000 people in the world, and they all died in a single catastrophe, you could say that event killed all the people in the world - regardless of how widespread it was.  However, this same passage says every animal outside of the Ark also died.  Did every beast and bird in the world also live in the Middle East?  You can see how this seems to confirm that it was the entire world that was flooded.


#5: Genesis 47:7-9, And Joseph brought in Jacob his father, and set him before Pharaoh: and Jacob blessed Pharaoh. And Pharaoh said unto Jacob, How old art thou? And Jacob said unto Pharaoh, The days of the years of my pilgrimage are an hundred and thirty years: few and evil have the days of the years of my life been, and have not attained unto the days of the years of the life of my fathers in the days of their pilgrimage.


When Pharaoh met Jacob for the first time, he apparently took note of Jacob’s great age.  At 130 years old, Jacob may have been one of the oldest people Pharaoh had ever met.  However Jacob claimed his days were “few” compared to the long lives of his forefathers.  


The Bible attests to extremely long-lived people from before the Flood.  Genesis 5:27 tells us of Methuselah, for example, who lived to be 969 years old.  Theistic evolutionists claim these seemingly long lives are actually symbolic numbers that convey some deeper meaning (i.e. some private interpretation).  In this passage, Jacob seems to confirm they’re meant to be literal.  He is saying his actual age of 130 was small compared to the antediluvian saints who lived for several centuries.


#6: Luke 3:23-38, The genealogy of Jesus


There are two genealogies of Jesus given in the Bible.  Most scholars agree one is maternal and the other paternal (by Joseph, the husband of Mary).  The genealogy in Luke traces all the generations of Jesus back to Adam, “the son of God.”  If the generations are meant to be consecutive (which I believe they are), it would be difficult to stretch them out a couple hundred thousands of years to when evolutionists claim the first modern human appeared.  Besides that, though, Luke is confirming that Adam was a literal person, created by God.  He had no ancestors before him.


Here’s the real problem that Luke’s genealogy brings to old earth interpretations of the Bible.  Most critics claim many figures of the Old Testament were fables or symbols.  My question, then, is when did these generations stop being myths and start becoming real?  Was it Adam, Noah, Abraham, or David?  Were they all myths all the way down to Jesus?  If that were the actual way to understand the Bible, how could I be sure Jesus was a real Person?  He could have been a “mythical character used to convey some deeper meaning!”  I have to shake my head.


#7: Mark 10:6-8, But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.


When asked about divorce, Jesus answered the Pharisees by quoting from Genesis.  Not only does He talk about Adam and Eve as though they were real people, Jesus also asserts they were made at the beginning of the creation.  Adam and Eve were made during the creation week and marriage has continued since then for all of history.


According to theistic evolution, the universe has existed for billions of years and the first humans appeared only 100,000-200,000 years ago.  In other words, the “creation” happened a long time ago and humans only arrived at the tail end of history.  This secular idea is in direct contradiction to the plain words of Jesus.


#8: Romans 5:12,17, Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned... For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)


The Bible is clear that death is the consequence of sin (Romans 6:23) and that sin entered the world by one man, namely Adam.  Death has reigned since Adam but Christ has conquered death and we shall reign with Him in life in the New Jerusalem.  Amen!!


According to theistic evolution, death was in the world long before Adam.  It was not the product of sin but the deliberate method that God used to create everything.  Death reigned long before Adam because that was how God wanted it!


These two views are diametrically opposed and we must decide which is correct.  I will side with the clear words of the Bible.


#9: Acts 17:24-26, God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;


According to the evolutionary idea of human origins, there was no literal Adam.  Homo sapiens are an evolved group that descended from a “not quite human” species of Homo and no single being could be identified as the ancestor of all modern people.  


When Paul was speaking to the Greeks on Mars Hill, he was preaching to them about the one, true God.  In this passage, he seems to confirm the creation account - that God made the world and everything in it and that all people of the world have descended from a single man.  


#10: Genesis 1:5b, “... And the evening and the morning were the first day.


In the entire first chapter of Genesis, the Bible punctuates each day with a similar phrase - it was evening and it was morning, the first day and et cetera.  Some critics will claim the word day can mean something other than an ordinary, 24-hour day.  That’s true, but when it’s modified by the words, “evening and morning,” as well as with ordinal numbers, “first day, second day,” it becomes extremely difficult for day to mean something other than an ordinary day.  


Consider 1 Samuel 17:16 which says, And the Philistine drew near morning and evening, and presented himself forty days.  What can this mean except that Goliath came out every morning and evening for forty days?  Consider, too, the reverse; what would the terms “evening and morning” mean if the days are meant to represent long periods of time?  


To suggest the days of Genesis are meant to be anything other than ordinary days is a textbook example of assigning a “private interpretation” to the passage.


CONCLUSION


Just as Jesus said to the Pharisees, I say to you now.  Read these passages for yourself and ask yourself what they mean.  I’m not claiming there is a secret meaning.  I’m not telling you there’s a different way to understand the plain words of the Bible.  I’m telling you the Bible speaks for itself.